4.1 Open Access Policy
Publications are available immediately upon publication freely, without any payment.
4.2 Vision and Mission
The vision of EJSsLS is to be one of the most preferable journals in Africa with the mission of disseminating quality publication to the wider readership.
4.3 Editorial Policy
Editorial policies are subjected to protect and strengthen the journal's integrity and quality aiming reader's interest. All the articles are produced with respect to the scope of the journal based on their significance, novelty and usefulness to the Journals readership. Decisions on manuscripts are not affected by the author's origin, gender, religion, ethnicity, nationality, race or political beliefs. No government policies or agencies away from the journal will determine the decision. Decisions taken are strictly based on the articles validity and importance to the scientific readers.
4.4 Aims and Scope
4.4.1 Aims
It aims to provide a platform for the research community to share their findings, insights and views about all aspects of Social Sciences and Language.
4.4.2 Scope
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences and Language Studies (EJSSLS) is an open access peer- reviewed journal published in both printed and online versions (The online version is free to access and download) two times in a year (June and December). The journal accepts the research papers from the diverse fields of social sciences, languages, and allied disciplines. The quality research in the areas of applied linguistics, communication, public relations, media studies, environmental studies, and related fields, is also invited for its publication in the journal. Papers can be submitted in the form of full- length original research, review articles, book reviews, commentaries, and Editorials - Policies, news and comment or letters to editor.
4.5 Readership
The primary audience of this publication would be academicians, research scholars, graduate students, and anyone interested in research.
4.6 Author Guidelines
Submission of a paper implies that all authors have seen and approved the manuscript and its contents, and that they are aware of the responsibilities connected to authorship. Signatures from all the authors are not required; it is the corresponding author's responsibility to obtain agreement from all authors supporting the submission. The corresponding author will be notified upon receipt of a new manuscript and upon acceptance of a manuscript, and the editorial board corresponds only with the Corresponding Author, whose responsibility is to communicate with all other authors.
4.7 Declaration
Submission of a manuscript implies that it reports unpublished work and that neither itself, nor parts of it, have been published or are under consideration for publication elsewhere. By submitting a manuscript to the Journal, the authors guarantee that they have the appropriate authority from their employers and/or funding agencies to publish the work. Any related work under consideration, review, revision or accepted for publication elsewhere must accompany the submission if they are relevant to its scientific assessment. Authors should submit complete unpublished and original works, which are not under review in any other journals. When submitting the manuscript, the authors should declare that the manuscripts have not been published or are under consideration for publication elsewhere. They should also declare in the cover page and/or the methodology section about their AI use (see 4.11.3 below for detail).
4.8 Conflicts of Interest
In the interests of transparency and to help editors and reviewers assess any potential bias, the Journal requires authors of original research papers to declare their specific contribution to the work and any competing commercial interests in relation to the submitted work. It is difficult to specify a threshold at which a financial interest becomes significant, but as a practical guideline, we would suggest this to be any undeclared interest that could embarrass you were it to become publicly known. Referees and editors are also subject to Conflict of Interest regulations.
4.9 Submission Policy
Manuscripts should be submitted online in A4 paper in single spacing (for cost minimization of the printed version). To facilitate the rapid publication and reduce administrative costs, EJSSLS accepts only electronic submissions in word format. The journal requires all authors who submit manuscripts to register an account with the Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID). ORCID iDs for all authors and co- authors must be included in the author information at the time of submission, and they will be published alongside the paper if it is accepted.
4.10 Data Collection and Presentation
Presented data must represent the findings in a fair and accurate manner. This includes appropriate statistical analysis and image processing (For further details, please refer to the General Guide to manuscript submission). The Editors deserve the right to request original versions of figures and the source data that were used to assemble the figure from the authors of a paper under consideration, or of a paper already published in The Journal.
4.11 Originality, Plagiarism, and AI Use
4.11.1 Originality
The editors require that any information published in the Journal represents a substantially novel contribution to the scientific record. Any manuscript submitted to EJSSLS should therefore not contain content that has been formally published in a peer reviewed journal or another citable form, whether in print or electronic. This includes websites, blogs and the news media. Any text, data, material, images, ideas or quotes should be attributed to the original source, even if it is by the same authors.
4.11.2 Plagiarism/ Similarity Index
The publisher and the Journal (EJSSLS) have a policy of "Zero Tolerance on the Plagiarism". All submitted articles must first pass an initial originality screening through Turnitin before they are forwarded for peer review. EJSSLS will not consider any manuscript with a similarity index greater than 20%.
4.11.3 Use of Large Language Models and Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools
A. AI use guidance for authors in submissions (authoring, manuscript preparation)
AI Content Check: Starting in 2027, EJSSLS manuscripts must not contain more than 20% AI- generated content or content created with AI- assisted tools. Any use of AI must be clearly disclosed. This includes specifying the tool name, version, date, and the purpose of use. If AI is used—for example, to draft text, analyse data, generate figures, or edit content—this must be stated in the Declaration and Methods sections. Include a disclosure such as: "AI tool X was used for Y purpose, and all outputs were verified by the authors."
Editing requirements: AI- assisted editing must not introduce errors, and all edits must be performed under editorial supervision.
Authorship and responsibility: Authors remain solely responsible for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of the manuscript. AI systems cannot be credited as co- authors because they do not hold legal accountability.
Consequences: Failure to disclose required information may lead to manuscript rejection, retraction, or bans on future submissions.
B. AI Use guidance for reviewers
"Using AI tools on the manuscript makes it public, violating the confidentiality principle, disclosing confidential information in public, and compromising transparency". Peer review is often seen as a confidential, human- driven process, so AI use is more restricted here to protect manuscript confidentiality and maintain review quality.
a) Possibility of using AI
EJSSLS reviewers might use AI to:
- Spot a reference gap or to uncover an argument the manuscript may have missed, by uploading the paper's bibliography and searching for relevant works that should have been cited.
- Ask conceptual questions about the assumptions underlying the authors' choices. For instance: "If I apply statistical test X, what conditions must the data satisfy?" Comparing the paper's stated assumptions with its actual results helps you spot logical flaws, especially when the topic is new to you.
- Look up related papers in the same field using AI based semantic search tools such as SciSpace, to help you critically evaluate the topic and/or the novelty of the method/subject area.
b) Probations of using AI
EJSSLS reviewers:
- Should not upload manuscripts to public or commercial AI systems during review, and must confirm they haven't done so. "Reviewers must not use any tools based on large language models and generative AI to generate review reports."
- Must not use AI to generate reviews or recommendations without editor approval.
C. AI use guidance for editors
- Editors must not share information about submitted manuscripts or peer-review reports with any tools that use large language models or generative AI.
- Where a review report appears vague, generic, inconsistent, or suggestive of AI overreliance, editors should reject the report, request clarification, contact the reviewer or seek a new review.
- Editors may raise concerns about the quality of the review reports they receive. They should take seriously such concerns and address fairly.
4.12 Correction Policy
When any errors are noticed on published manuscripts, authors should inform the journal's Editor- in- Chief and/or Managing Editor so that corrections are made at the journal's discretion. EJSSLS encourage readers and authors to notify them (the board members) if they find errors, especially errors that could affect the interpretation of data or information presented in an article. If there is no reason to doubt the validity of the findings or the reliability of the data, it is not appropriate to retract a publication solely on the grounds of an authorship dispute. The correction procedure depends on the publication stage of the article:
Online First publication
The Online First (or published ahead of print) version is considered the version of record, and not an opportunity to make changes prior to print publication. EJSSLS will consider replacing this version with an updated version which corrects the error and notifies that the change has been made (in a correction notice at the end of the article). The correction notice will be retained in the print version for record.
If the article has already appeared in an issue, a correction notice will be printed in the next available print issue. The online version of the article will link to the correction notice, and vice versa.
4.13 Publication Ethics and Misconduct Policy
A. Procedures for Handling Complaints and Appeals
1. Reporting Suspected Misconduct
Anyone may report suspected unethical behavior or academic misconduct to the Editorial Staff at any time. To initiate an investigation, the reporter must provide relevant information and supporting evidence.
2. Investigation Protocol
Initiation: The Editor- in- Chief, in consultation with Section Editors and the Editorial Board, determines whether to launch a formal investigation.
Confidentiality: All evidence gathered during the review remains strictly confidential. It will only be shared with individuals directly involved in the investigation.
Right to Respond: The accused party will always be given a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations brought against them.
Classification: If the investigation concludes that misconduct occurred, the offense will be classified as either minor or serious.
Minor Misconduct
Minor misconduct involves small misunderstandings or misapplications of academic standards. These matters are resolved directly with the individuals involved without escalating to external parties.
Corrective Communication: Editors will contact authors or reviewers to clarify and correct minor errors in academic standards.
Warning Letters: The journal may issue a formal warning letter to the author or reviewer regarding the minor infraction.
Major Misconduct
For serious infractions, the Editor- in- Chief, Section Editors, and the Editorial Board will evaluate the evidence to determine disciplinary actions. If necessary, they may also consult an independent panel of experts.
3. Sanctions
The journal may enforce one or more of the following sanctions: Public Notice: Publishing a formal announcement or editorial detailing the misconduct.
Employer Notification: Sending an official letter to the individual's head of department or institutional employer.
Article Retraction: Formally retracting the published work from the journal in accordance with Retraction Policy given below.
Submission Ban: Barring the individual from submitting any new work to the journal for a specified period.
External Escalation: Referring the case to a professional organization, regulatory body, or legal authority for further action.
4. Investigation & Response Timeline
To ensure a fair and efficient process, the journal adheres to the following maximum timelines: Initial Acknowledgement: The editorial team will acknowledge receipt of a misconduct report within 5 working days.
Preliminary Review: Editors will decide whether to launch a formal investigation within 14 working days of receiving the evidence.
Notification and Request for Response: Once an investigation is approved, the accused party will be notified immediately and given 30 calendar days to submit a formal response and any counter- evidence.
Extension Requests: Under exceptional circumstances, the accused may request a single extension of up to 14 calendar days, which must be approved by the Editor- in- Chief.
Final Decision: The Editorial Board aims to conclude the investigation and issue a final decision within 60 calendar days of receiving the accused party's response.
5. Retraction Policy
Article retraction may be due to infringements of professional ethical codes. This journal follows standard international guidelines to correct the academic record and ensure scientific integrity. Retractions are not intended to punish authors, but rather to flag unreliable data.
A. Grounds for Retraction
An article will be considered for retraction if the Editorial Board finds clear evidence of:
- Unreliability: Serious data fabrication, falsification, or major calculation errors that invalidate the findings.
- Plagiarism: Severe duplication or uncredited use of text, data, or ideas belonging to others.
- Redundant Publication: The findings have already been published elsewhere without proper cross- reference or permission.
- Unethical Research: The study failed to adhere to necessary ethical clearances or participant safety protocols.
- Compromised Peer Review: The manuscript was accepted due to a manipulated or fraudulent peer review process.
B. Display of Retracted Material
To maintain a complete historical and scholarly archive, retracted papers are never entirely deleted from public viewing. Instead, they are handled via the following protocol:
- Watermarking: The original online PDF version will remain accessible but will feature a permanent, prominent "RETRACTED" watermark diagonally across every page.
- Retraction Notice: A separate, freely accessible Retraction Notice will be published and digitally linked to the original article. This notice will objectively detail the reasons for the retraction and state who initiated it.
- A retraction notice will also be published in the next available print issue.
- In rare cases, the editors may have to remove the original content for legal reasons. In such cases the editor (s) will leave the metadata (title and authors) and replace the text with a note saying the article has been removed for legal reasons. A retraction notice will also be published online and/or in print.
- Retraction notices are indexed and linked to the original records in EJSSLS Web.
C. Appeals Process
Authors or reviewers who disagree with the final disciplinary decision of the Editorial Board have the right to appeal. The process is designed to handle disputes objectively and transparently.
a. Submitting an Appeal
Timeline: Appeals must be submitted in writing within 30 calendar days of the date the decision notification was sent.
Requirements: The appellant must provide a clear statement explaining why the decision is believed to be wrong, accompanied by objective new evidence. Generic disagreements without factual backup will not be reviewed.
Grounds for Appeal: Appeals are only considered if there is evidence of a procedural error in the investigation, clear bias by an investigator, or significant new evidence that was previously unavailable.
b. Review of the Appeal
The Appeals Panel: The Editor- in- Chief will appoint an independent Appeals Panel consisting of three members of the Editorial Board who had no prior involvement in the original investigation or decision.
Timeline for Resolution: The panel will review the appeal and issue a definitive recommendation within 45 calendar days of receipt.
Final Ruling: The final decision on the appeal rests with the Editor- in- Chief based on the panel's findings. No further internal appeals will be considered.
The editorial team of EJSSLS follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines to manage all complaints and appeals. (COPE): https://publicationethics.org/guidance/Flowcharts.
4.14 Citation
Comprehensive and accurate citation of the relevant literature is essential. We require citation of the primary literature wherever appropriate. See General Guidelines for Manuscript Submission.
4.15 Language Policy
English is the language the Journal uses. Authors must use consistently either UK or American English. In the future, Ethiopian languages (e.g., Afan Oromo and Amharic) can be considered based on need and feasibility assessment.
4.16 Copyrights and Licensing
Authors keep the copyright to their published papers and give the publisher a non- exclusive license to publish the article, to be credited as the original publisher upon reuse, and to distribute it in all formats and media. The articles are released under the "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)" license.
4.17 Subscription Fee
The online publication is accessible freely. Authors are not requested to pay during submission for publication and to access after publication. However, for the print version, the subscription fee per issue and postage service varies for individual subscribers, institutional subscribers, and countries (local and overseas). The fee is determined based on the existing situation as publication and postage prices may vary from time to time or Issue to Issue.